Towards a Peer Review of GeoHumanities Projects

Is the reasoning behind the selection of a particular gazetteer or data source described?

While this section is not meant to be narrow and about interface design, I do think there is room to ask whether adequate documentation about interface design/methodology has been included.

Is there any information relating to licensing/ future usage of elements of the project (e.g. creative commons licence), and citation?

And audience(s)?

Is the rationale for choice of software included in project documentation?

[from poster session] New Question: What about methodology sections in our writing?

[from poster session] New Question: Does the work produce new artifacts for the community? (ex. geo-referenced TIFFs that others could use & adapt)?

[from poster session] New Question: Where on the continuum of geohumanities does the project fall?

[from poster session] New Question: Are the manipulations of other’s data explained?

[from poster session] Does the site have a colophon describing the technologies? Have you credited the technologists?